Back to Apps
Maze logo

Maze

6.3/ 10

Rapid user testing and research platform — run unmoderated usability tests, surveys, and prototype tests with direct Figma integration.

Rating Breakdown

Time-to-ValueUsabilityIntegrationsAutomationDACHData ExportRolesSupportPricingPerformanceAI
Time-to-Value7.0
Usability7.5
Integrations7.0
Automation5.5
DACH Fit5.0
Data Portability6.0
Roles & Permissions6.0
Support6.5
Price Transparency6.0
Performance7.5
AI Usefulness5.0

Best Fit For

AgenciesGreat fitStartupsGood fitEnterpriseGood fit

Key Features

Unmoderated usability testing at scale
Direct Figma and prototype integration
Survey and questionnaire builder
Automated analytics and heatmap reports
Participant panel and recruitment tools
Shareable reports with actionable metrics

Ideal For

Design agencies testing prototypes with users
UX teams validating design decisions quickly
Product teams gathering user feedback
Agencies presenting research to clients

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Direct Figma integration is seamless
  • Automated analytics reduce research overhead
  • Unmoderated tests scale without scheduling
  • Shareable reports impress clients
  • Fast setup from prototype to live test

Cons

  • Participant recruitment costs extra
  • Limited to unmoderated testing methods
  • Free plan has significant restrictions
  • Advanced analysis requires higher plans

Pricing

Freemiumfrom €56/Mo

Category

Design & Creative/Prototyping

Tags

User TestingUsabilityResearchFigma

Alternatives

Similar Tools

MazeGuide for Agencies

Maze has become the user testing platform of choice for design agencies that want to validate their work with real users without the time and cost overhead of traditional moderated research. By connecting directly to Figma prototypes, Maze lets agencies set up and launch usability tests in minutes rather than days — getting quantitative and qualitative feedback that turns subjective design debates into evidence-based decisions.

For agencies, the ability to test fast and present findings professionally is critical. Maze's automated analytics generate heatmaps, success rates, misclick rates, and time-on-task metrics without manual analysis. The shareable reports package these findings into client-ready formats that clearly show which design options perform better and where users struggle. This data-driven approach elevates the agency's credibility and helps justify design recommendations with evidence rather than opinions.

Compared to UserTesting, Maze is more affordable and faster to set up but limited to unmoderated testing — you won't get the depth of moderated sessions. Compared to Hotjar, Maze focuses on prototype testing before development rather than post-launch behavior analysis. For design agencies that want to integrate user testing into their regular workflow without adding a full-time researcher, Maze provides the right balance of speed, insight, and professional presentation.